Are microcalcifications of the breast something to be worry about?

 

Q: What does it mean to have microcalcifications of the breast? I have had a mammogram and need to return due to microcalcifications. Are these something I need to be worried about? I have a huge history of breast cancer in my family, including my mom and sister both passing of breast cancer.

A: Microcalcifications are tiny specks of the mineral calcium—as small as a grain of salt—that are sometimes seen in breast tissue when viewed on a mammogram (screening breast x-ray). These mineral specks may be individual or they may form clusters.

Most microcalcifications are noncancerous cells. In some cases, they may be indicators of a highly curable, early-stage breast cancer known as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). If a mammogram determines that some microcalcifications may be questionable, a biopsy will determine if they are normal or not.

--Bernice Crook, RN, OCN

Many cancers can be identified early, when they are most treatable, through sophisticated screening tests.

Latest Cancer News
ACOG Updates Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines

November 20, 2009 — The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) has revised its cervical cancer screening recommendations: the organization now recommends that women begin screening at the age of 21 and receive screening at less frequent intervals. These recommendations will be published in the December 2009 issue of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

New Velcade®-melphalan Transplant Regimen for Multiple Myeloma

November 20, 2009 — Researchers from France have reported encouraging results with adding Velcade® (bortezomib) to high-dose melphalan followed by autologus stem cell infusion for initial treatment of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. The details of this Phase II study appeared in an early online publication in Blood on November 2, 2009.

Folic Acid May Be Beneficial in Patients with Recurrent Colorectal Adenoma Who Are Folate Deficient

November 20, 2009 — Researchers affiliated with the Health Professional Follow-Up Study and the Nurses’ Health Study have reported that folic acid supplementation in patients with recurrent colorectal adenoma was not protective or harmful in most patients. However, patients who were folate deficient had a significant 39% decrease in adenoma recurrence. The details of this study appeared in an early online publication on October 28, 2009 in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

Select news items provided by Reuters Health