Media Reporting & Nutrition Fear

Recent media reports on the connection between red meat and risk of breast cancer bother me, but not for the reason you may think. I'm no fan of red meat and there are many reasons to limit your intake of this food. Red meat can be a source of carcinogenic (cancer-causing) chemicals that are created when it is grilled, barbecued or cooked at high temperatures. Red meat can be high in saturated fat, which is linked to greater risk of heart disease and some types of cancer. Red meat offers very little, if anything, in terms of cancer-fighting nutrients. And finally, the production of red meat is resource-intensive and expensive and it results in much greater environmental damage than producing comparable amounts, calorie-per-calorie, of plant food.

However, even though you won't find me singing the praises of red meat, I think recent media reports have given this food a bum rap. When it comes to health, I may not be a fan of this particular food, but one thing I am a fan of is truthful reporting on the science of nutrition and cancer. And when it comes to health and science reporting, nutrition is one area where misleading headlines are the norm and hysteria is used to attract attention. Reports about the wonders of one food and the evils of another abound. And this is why the recent reports about research findings on red meat and breast cancer risk bother me.

One headline claims, "Red Meat/Breast Cancer Connection Cited." Another states, "Breast Cancer Risk Linked To Red Meat, Study Finds." Within the first few lines of yet another story, you'll find the statement, "But if you're a fan of a steak or ground beef and if you're a woman it's not only ironic, it's potentially life threatening." If you take these headlines and this news content at face value, you would believe that red meat, of any kind and in any quantity, will doom a woman to a future diagnosis of breast cancer! This sounds like scary stuff, but what is the truth behind these headlines?

The study on which these headlines are based was published in the November issue of The Archives of Internal Medicine. The finding from this study that attracted the most attention is that women who eat more than 1.5 servings of red meat per day  have nearly two times the risk of breast cancer as compared to women eating 3 or fewer servings of red meat per week . To put this in perspective, when you compare women who eat multiple servings of red meat every day, which includes beef, lamb or pork, to women who eat red meat just a couple of times per week or not at all, you see a higher risk of breast cancer in the heavy meat eaters. Is this surprising?

What else is different between these two groups? And how many women eat red meat multiple times per day, every single day? Do you think that women who eat a lot of red meat every single day differ in terms of their other habits when compared to women who rarely or never eat red meat? People who eat healthfully, including those who eat very little or no meat, often are in better health for a variety of reasons. They exercise more, they are thinner, they eat less fat, they visit the doctor more, and they smoke less than people with an unhealthy diet. Any one of these health habits will reduce risk of cancer, regardless of the presence or absence of meat in the diet!

The truth is, when you look behind the headlines, it's not surprising that eating a diet full of red meat is bad for health.

Hundreds of studies tell us that eating a diet in which the majority of calories come from plant foods including vegetables, fruit, whole grains and legumes is an effective way to reduce cancer risk, regardless of whether that diet contains meat. And if a person's diet does contain a lot of red meat, it is not likely to contain the abundance of vegetables, fruit, whole grains and legumes that are known to reduce cancer risk.

The most important point to remember is that there are many reasons why eating a lot of meat may raise cancer risk. Similarly, there are many reasons why eating plenty of vegetables, fruit, whole grains, and legumes provides protection against cancer and other diseases. Small amounts of meat, as part of a total healthy diet, do not appear to increase cancer risk. However, eating more than a few servings of meat per week and certainly eating several servings per day, particularly of red meat, heavily cooked meat, and processed meat is linked with higher cancer risk.

The key is balance: If you want to eat meat, do so in moderation!

In summary, I don't like red meat, I don't think it's a healthy food, I don't eat it myself, and I certainly don't encourage people to eat more of it! But I also don't like scare tactics and misleading headlines. When it comes to red meat, the recent headlines were unfair and misleading. As with all things in nutrition, the truth nearly always lies somewhere in the middle.

Nutritionist Suzanne


Posted Jan 03 2007, 08:14 PM by SuzanneDixon
Filed under:
 
SuzanneDixon